American Disability Rights
  • Menu
    • Guide to Disability Rights Laws
    • Service Dogs
    • Service Dogs in Training
    • Emotional Support Animals
    • Public Access
    • Reasonable Accommodations
American Disability Rights
  • Service Dogs
  • Emotional Support Animals
  • Disability Civil Rights
  • Menu

1995

Bronk v. Ineichen

Cases, Fair Housing Act
May 11, 2018

Plaintiffs subsequently moved for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, and now challenge on appeal the district judge’s denial of these motions and certain of her evidentiary rulings.   While the record demonstrates ample evidence to support the determination of no liability, we are concerned that the tendered jury instructions may have confused jury members by unnecessarily conflating local, state, and federal law.   We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

0
2763
1995, 54 F.3d 425, Alisha Bronk, Bernard Ineichen, Madison, Monica Jay, Wisconsin
  • Search
  • Donate to ADR Today

© 2017- American Disability Rights, Inc. Do not reuse text, graphics or educational materials without written permission.

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap

An IRS 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Tax Exempt Organization.

SearchPostsLogin
Wednesday, 1, Jan
HUD asks FTC to investigate websites selling assistance animal documentation
Sunday, 10, Nov
Families claim they paid thousands for service animal and got expensive pet
Saturday, 9, Nov
DOJ settles ADA complaint about hotels not honoring reservations for disabled vets with service dogs
Wednesday, 6, Nov
Norwich man says car dealership denied him job because of service dog
Sunday, 3, Nov
The number of fake emotional support dogs is exploding – why?
Sunday, 3, Nov
Amid pit bull debate, service dogs prove life-changing for Sioux City veterans

Welcome back,