AMERICAN DISABILITY RIGHTS INC
  • Service Dogs
  • Emotional Support Animals
  • Disability Civil Rights
  • Menu
AMERICAN DISABILITY RIGHTS INC
  • Service Dogs
  • Emotional Support Animals
  • Disability Civil Rights
  • Menu

1995

Bronk v. Ineichen

Cases, Fair Housing Act
November 22, 2025

Plaintiffs subsequently moved for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, and now challenge on appeal the district judge’s denial of these motions and certain of her evidentiary rulings.   While the record demonstrates ample evidence to support the determination of no liability, we are concerned that the tendered jury instructions may have confused jury members by unnecessarily conflating local, state, and federal law.   We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

0
4400
1995, 54 F.3d 425, Alisha Bronk, Bernard Ineichen, Madison, Monica Jay, Wisconsin

© 2017- AMERICAN DISABILITY RIGHTS INC

Information provided does not imply legal advice.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap
An IRS 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Tax Exempt Organization. EIN: 82-2055904

SearchPostsLogin
Saturday, 22, Nov
What property management companies need to know about emotional support animals
Saturday, 22, Nov
What apartment management companies need to know about emotional support animals
Saturday, 22, Nov
What hotels need to know about emotional support animals
Saturday, 22, Nov
What retail businesses need to know about emotional support animals
Saturday, 22, Nov
What restaurants need to know about emotional support animals
Saturday, 22, Nov
What Uber and Lyft drivers need to know about Emotional Support Animals

Welcome back,